![]() |
David Ford MLA, Leader of the Alliance Party Leading Change in Antrim & Newtownabbey since 1998 |
![]() |
| David Ford MLA, Leader of the Alliance Party | <david.ford@allianceparty.org> | 12th February 2012 |
Reversing the Deputy Speaker's ruling on Free Personal CareSpeech by David Ford delivered to Assembly, 29 May 2007: Deputy Speaker incorrectly ruled an Alliance amendment defeated on Tue 29th May 2007 Mr Deputy Speaker: The Question is that amendment No 1 standing on the Marshalled List be made. All those in favour say "Aye". Some Members: Aye. Mr Deputy Speaker: Contrary, if any, "No". Some Members: No. Some Members: Aye. Some Members: No. Mr Deputy Speaker: The Noes have it. The Question is that amendment No 2 standing on the - Mr Ford: On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. It has been a precedent in this Assembly that, when a significant number of voices are raised, there has always been a recorded Division. On what grounds have you refused to grant a Division on amendment No 1? Mr Deputy Speaker: One has to find out what the definition of "significant number" is, Mr Ford. The very clear indication of the House was that the Noes had it. [Interruption.] Order. Mr Ford: Further to that point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker, I was not querying your interpretation of the sounds made in the Chamber; I was making the point that there was a precedent in cases in which a significant number of voices were raised. Indeed, after a similar vote five years ago, the voices of only five Members were accepted and a Division granted. Clearly more than five Members shouted "Aye" today. Some Members: Hear, hear. Mr Deputy Speaker: [after consultation with Clerks] It is my intention, therefore, to put the Question again. Question put, That amendment No 1 be made. The Assembly divided: The Assembly divided: Ayes 48; Noes 47. [The Alliance amendment was actually passed.]
Bookmark this story at:
[ Published and promoted by David Ford MLA, Leader of the Alliance Party, Unit 2, 21A Carnmoney Rd, Newtownabbey BT36 6HL. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |